The brutally honest truth of the matter is that Arlen Specter’s defection to the Democratic Party is the unofficial confirmation that there is only one political party in this country.
Mr. Specter is the sort of conservative who should be leading the Republican Party – not the sort of conservative the Republicans consider too “liberal” to be in their party.
The Republicans basically forced Mr. Specter out for being an independent thinker – someone who actually considered the merits of policy rather than simply the adherence to the religion of Republicanism – whatever that is.
As Mr. Specter said in his news conference today, the Republicans are more concerned with party purity than anything else – including winning elections. And that means there is no real political debate in this country.
And this may be a good thing in the short term.
Although I would normally take the conservative view that government paralysis is a good thing because it keeps government weak, I think the history of the great depression shows that we are better off if government has the power to act to combat the current economic crisis than if it does not.
Arlen Specter’s defection, along with the eventual seating of Al Franken, will give Obama the power to accomplish much. If Obama plays this right, he really could emerge as a transformational figure in American history – and that could be for the better.
But longer term, I fear for
While I do agree with most Americans that our country has been heading in the wrong direction for the past eight years (at least), and like a majority of Americans agree with many of the changes President Obama has promised to make, I also recognize that there needs to be a debate in this country – and that a government that is controlled by a single party is a dangerous one which will eventually become even more inefficient and even more corrupt than it is now.
So there needs to be a real debate in
Mr. Specter said something else during his press conference that I think is very important. He said that conservatives should be very angry at what the Republican Party has become and should stage an uprising. He’s right.
The problem with the Republicans right now is that they don’t represent conservatism – or really anything for that matter. They are simply contrary. And that’s dangerous.
Conservatives, as opposed to Republicans, believe in smaller government, fiscal responsibility, and personal responsibility. And that is a philosophy that has an important place in the political debate.
Conservatives are thinkers – not blind followers – who don’t want the current President to fail just so they can claim victory. They want their voices heard, but are willing to compromise where necessary and contribute to the hard work that is essential – now more than ever – for this country to succeed.
So who are the Republicans nowadays? They aren’t conservatives. And they certainly aren’t thinkers.
To be brutally honest, the GOP has become the Grand Old Party of the Willfully Ignorant. They take pride in ignoring facts, not listening to experts, and avoiding political debate.
Remember, this is the party that grew government while cutting revenues. The Republicans are the ones that spent this country into bankruptcy – not the Democrats. And it is the Republicans that argue for bigger government in our personal lives – while cutting government where it is actually needed – like regulation for Wall Street or enforcement of consumer protection laws.
Inconsistency seems to be their motto.
The Republican “philosophy” isn’t conservatism. It is actually closer in many ways to radical liberalism, although I would argue that it’s just plain thoughtless. And it is certainly irresponsible.
And who is the leader of the Republican Party right now? Who is this God of political wisdom that these idiots blindly worship? Rush Limbaugh.
I’ll admit – and this may surprise many of you – I listen to Rush Limbaugh’s show sometimes. On long car trips, I often search for it because I find the man very entertaining in a laugh-out-loud kind of way. He really is very good at what he does – and knows radio – you have to give him that.
But to take him seriously…??!!
Let’s take a look at Mr. Limbaugh for a moment. If you believe in ignoring facts, in not listening or respecting experts, in not engaging in meaningful political debate, in ignoring even the pretense of consistency in your arguments – and in remaining in a state of blissful ignorance – than I guess he’s the guy you want to follow.
This is a guy who couldn’t pass a single course (including ballroom dancing) during his one year at
This is a guy who is ardently pro-war and pro-torture – yet never served in the military. This is a guy who defends
This is a guy whose response to Arlen Specter leaving the Republican Party was: take John McCain with you.
This is the mentality we’re dealing with here.
What’s the solution? I think conservatives have to let the Republican Party go.
Conservatives should let the zealots without a cause have the GOP – and form a new, viable, conservative party (perhaps they could combine with the Libertarian Party – which seems a better fit for people like Arlen Specter and other thinking conservatives than the Democratic Party).
Yes, this will take many years – and conservatives will have to concede a few election cycles – but the alternative is a de facto single-party system in
A brief personal note: Sorry about the lack of content lately – the kids were on vacation and it has been impossible to get anything done. The production of the video portion of this blog is progressing nicely and should be ready by next week at the latest.
I'll have a few things to say about the issue of taxes and Obama's first 100 days.

6 comments:
While I agree completely that the GOP has become an party of whackadoodles who are obsessed with adherence to the orthodoxy of whackadoodledom, thus making themselves more irrelevant with every screech of opposition to virtually anything except war, torture, and no taxes for the wealthy, I can't give Specter a pass.
While it's great he's "joined" the Democrats, it's a pretty nakedly opportunistic move based purely on electoral politics and maintaining his power in government. He's facing a brutal primary against one of the whackadoodle's own and has been trailing in the polls. He read the writing on the wall: stay a Republican and lose your Senate seat; switch parties and run as a Democrat and likely win the general election while gaining more power by being in the majority.
I read a report that Specter may get the chair of the Judiciary Committee, which would be quite a perk.
Sorry, I may be cynical about this, but I just don't see this as a move based on principle.
Now, if Olympia Snow makes the jump, I would see that as a move based on principle.
Hello LostSailor. I don't blame you for your cyncism. I felt the same way yesterday when I was reading the Senator's profile in full. He has a real flip flopping record as far as affiliation.
It will be interesting to see how political parties will realign in this country if the GOP officially falls. I've been seeing this coming ever since the election when I was canvassing right along with a group called: "Republicans for Obama".
However, political debate is still alive and well even under one party. Like the one happening between Patterson and Diaz Sr. in this state.
So...will everyone just camp out by more precise ideologies next?
For me, politics is generally entertainment, with the few folks who are serious about actually doing something laboring in the background.
I'm quite looking forward to Sarah Palin's run for President in a few years. (While also hoping that the entertainment doesn't turn from comedy into tragedy.)
That said, the Republicans will only survive if the real conservatives regain the upper hand. I know a few of the whackadoodles and if you mention, for example, someone like Russell Kirk or Richard Weaver and they have no idea who those people are (not that I necessarily subscribe to Kirk or Weaver, but at least I have read some of their work).
True conservatism is a philosophy, but the Rebulicans have gone from philosophy to ideology to being ideologues to being just idiots.
Great comments. I completely agree that Arlen Specter is basically just trying to save his ass here. And I didn't mean to imply that I'm a big fan of his, by the way.
But I do think it says something about the state of the Republican Party that Arlen Specter can't be a member.
And yes -- it will be entertaining to see Sarah Palin run for President -- but it is also really terrifying that she's a serious contenter.
The Republican party seem to be contracting to the hard-core righties and wing-nuts. If that continues, they will be a marginal party for years to come.
While part of me thinks this is a good thing, I also recognize that a conservative counter-balance to some of the more whacky liberal impluses of the Democrats in a healthy thing, and a severely marginalized Republican party will be ineffective as a counter-balance.
Maybe this will actually give rise to a real third party of moderate conservatives.
The interesting thing is that moderate conservatives have yet to discovered themselves in one identity. Some are still clinging to the bare threads of the GOP. Some call themselves Libertarians. Some are joining the Democrat party for the popularity but know themselves as "Conservative Democrats". When I look at all these individuals and their ideologies, I see pretty much the same pattern in every person's ideology with a different loyalty leaning. If there is one thing that liberals (whacky or otherwise)and moderate Democrats have in their favor right now is a drive to socially organize (fiercely! even in a disorganized way). But this value of political or community organization is seen as too "socialist" a skill (read value) to adopt.
Post a Comment