Thursday, March 26, 2009

Legalization of Marijuana


I was disappointed but not surprised to read that President Obama – a man who prides himself on his rational decision making -- dismissed an online question in his recent town hall meeting advocating the legalization of marijuana. Unfortunately, Mr. Obama has taken a completely irrational position on this issue in the name of political correctness.

Don’t get me wrong – President Obama has no choice in this matter. Endorsement of marijuana legalization would give his Republican enemies enough red meat to last the next seven years and beyond, although ironically some of our Nation’s most prominent conservative voices have advocated such a change in our drug policies for years.

Let’s look at the facts.

We are a nation of hypocrites when it comes to drugs. We are the largest consumer of drugs (legal and illegal), yet we rage against a few of the least harmful ones as if they were sent to us by the Devil himself. We drink like fish, smoke like chimneys, and get our doctors to prescribe us all sorts of potent, addictive, and deadly goodies – except for pot. That’s evil – even if medically necessary.

In the context of what is legal and illegal in America, marijuana is relatively harmless. It isn’t physically addictive in the way that tobacco and alcohol are and it is virtually impossible to overdose on. The smoke – even unfiltered – doesn’t correlate with lung cancer. In fact, there was a 2007 study that showed the active ingredient in pot (THC) actually inhibits the growth of common lung cancer tumors.

I’m not arguing that pot is good for you (although it does have valid medical uses), but when compared to alcohol, tobacco, many proscription drugs, and even a few over-the-counter drugs -- it is pretty innocuous.

And it is readily available. Your kids can pick some up at the local mall – I don’t care where you live. Let’s not kid ourselves.

We spend billions on the war against drugs while tent cities spring up in California. Very honestly, this is money that is being thrown down a black hole bigger than the one the TARP money went down on Wall Street.

It’s a simple matter of economics. When there is large demand for something, it will be available in the market. When governments try for unreasonable reasons to prohibit what the market has a high demand for, they create an underground market which is uncontrollable – and which inevitably leads to more harm than good.

We had prohibition against alcohol in the United States for the exact same reasons we now have prohibition against marijuana. We considered drinking to be immoral, therefore we banned it.

What happened? Everybody continued to drink – they just did it at underground clubs owned by the mob – a mob which became very powerful as a result of vastly increased revenues. Al Capone and others got rich, the alcohol went untaxed, lots of cops and politicians were paid bribes to look the other way, and lots of people got killed in the turf wars that sprang up.

Sound familiar? Look what’s happening on our boarder with Mexico. The Mexican government is powerless to stop the carnage -- and the violence is beginning to spill over into our country in the form of murders and kidnappings.

And look what's happening in our own inner cities. I taught at at a New York City public high school before I taught college, and I had several of my thirteen year old eighth graders describe how they had seen people gunned down in the streets or had friends or family gunned down in this unwinnable war.

I remember very vividly one of my high school freshman, a friendly young man -- just thirteen years old -- showing me the scars from where he had been shot -- the innocent victim of a drive-by shooting. He described being shot as a burning feeling. He said he was surprised -- that he didn't think being shot would feel like that.

I cannot imagine the harm such experiences do to children, nor can I imagine the harm they do to the communities they live in. What I do know is that leaving things the way they are is no answer.

Legalizing marijuana – and possibly some other drugs such as cocaine – would go a long way toward emasculating the drug cartels that have done so much harm to so many. The health costs of such a policy change are manageable – and arguably may not even exist -- considering these drugs are readily available no matter what we do.

Legalization of marijuana would also go a long way toward getting this nation back on track economically. We would no longer be spending large sums of money – both on the federal and on the state levels – investigating and imprisoning people -- many who have done society little (if any) harm. Legalization would also create jobs and generate significant tax revenue which could be applied to deficit reduction instead of financing the activities of drug lords both here and across the boarder.







8 comments:

Shanali said...

With so much focus on the economy, and the non-controversial items on his agenda that are sort of falling on the way side, a lot of challenging social issues will probably be placed on the back burner for a while. Hopefully this will not be for the entirety of his administration. I would be happy if he tried to actively pursue some challenging issues even in his last year in Office.

(...which I'm still rooting as year number 8..)

LostSailor said...

Unfortunately, full legalization is unlikely to happen in our lifetimes. Yes, it would be good policy; yes, it would reduce some of the corruption in government and in some of our law enforcement agencies; yes, it might provide some new revenue if taxed; yes, it would reduce or eliminate the violence associated with drugs. But those aren't the point.

This is an easy issue to demagogue on. For a politician, there is really no downside to being againt "drugs": they get to posture as "tough on crime" and pound their opponents if those opponents disagree. It cost them nothing.

The best we might hope for are states and localities to reduce the penalties associated with illegal drugs and persue more rational enforcement.

Matthew Rockwood, Esq. said...

I unfortunately have to agree with LostSailor on this one. New York did recently soften the draconian Rockefeller drug laws somewhat -- but this won't solve the problem.

I am encouraged that since I made the original post, there has been a lot of positive commentary in the news about the possibility of legalizing pot -- and a few surveys showing a surprising amount of public support for the idea.

Shanali said...

I understand and agree with both points as far as the power of the status quo.

However, I am really wondering if the new CJ Reform Act passes would it create a domino effect on this specific issue as well. If a state that is famous for being tough on crime begins to stir legislation towards restorative justice, then what could immediately follow is a consideration on laws that counteract or are counterproductive to said reform.

Here is the article that made my day this last week. And you bet I wrote a letter to our Senator to see if he would support it.

http://webb.senate.gov/email/criminaljusticereform.html

P.S. I'm doing some serious linking to this blog. ;)

Matthew Rockwood, Esq. said...

Great article Shanali. No doubt our criminal justice system is broken.

rpalomba said...

Excellent points, in both the original post and the responses. I could not agree more. Unfortunately, the problem finds its roots in deeper ground than what we may think; just an outsider (as far as America goes -- since I just moved here five years ago) perspective on the broader issue.

Yes, it is entirely true what LostSailor says, that is, "for a politician, there is really no downside to being againt `drugs'," makes them look "better;" they appear as if they are cracking down on "crime." First of all, let me tell you that I am from Naples, Italy that is (not God's waiting room in FL, where the apogee of Crime is a piece of paper thrown on a golf course), so whenever I hear a politician using his "iron fist" against a bunch of college potheads, it HAS TO make me smile. Please, crime is something else... Everybody can be tough with crackheads. (Note: the use of "derogatory" appellations is not part of MY lexical field; I am simply emphasizing the "legislator" point of view.)

The crimes related to drugs are the one mentioned by Matthew in his post, the events unfolding, as we speak, in southern states of this nation and with ramifications all over the country, the tax evasion (on a tax reform which will have pimps, potheads, dealers, etc pay taxes on a future post, that is a WHOLE new subject).

So, why are LostSailor, and Matthew right? And why Shanali's points and hopes are fully justified, but will meet resistance? It is certainly a human tendency, but I never saw this subconscious tendency dominate so much a public sphere as I saw it in this country: people confuse "legalizing" and "promoting". Somehow, by some magical flux, LEGALIZING pot will be an instigation from the Devil to undermine the pure and innocent fabric of American society, everybody will be smoking marijuana.

The problem is that parents themselves don't want to do their job. The responsibility of raising their kids and keeping them from whatever they may label as "evil" has to fall on the government shoulders. The beauty of this country is that you, as in individual, have all the right to think that smoking pot is the worse thing you could do. I am not, and whoever posted here is not, trying to sell the good values of marijuana. The downfall of this country is the lack of assumption of PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY (the reason for so many other issues); the attitude that someone else will hold your hand and tell you what/what not to do, and the ability to ALWAYS find someone else to blame. It is not a coincidence if this country's legal system allows for the most ridiculous law suits.

Somehow, the individualistic and self-made man/woman rising to the top with his/her own hands disappears in these instances and a very "twisted," definitely unhealthy notion of "socialism" comes to the rescue. The ability to grasp the difference between "legalizing" and "promoting" can only be achieved through education, not just in the scholastic sense of the word, and therefore through a drastic change in mentality. Cigarettes are legal (with restrictions of course, legalizing does not mean lack of rules), gambling is legalized, alcohol is legal, fast food is legal (that is the only one where I shall be bias and say UNFORTUNATELY), but not everybody abuses (or uses at all) of these "soul-damaging" items. Some people do, especially the latter one, and help is/should be in place for anyone who falls in a dependency state.

Somehow we have to break that LAW-dependence, that assumption that people do not do XYZ just because it is against this mystical power called the LAW. A lot of people do not do XYZ independently of the fact that a law is in place or not. Most of you do not own a gun, although you are perfectly entitled to do so. Even the Constitution "pushes" you to do so. Why don't you own one? I think that a society makes a huge leap forward when it is able to make the above-mentioned distinction; from a society of overly sheltered zombie-like teenagers and young adults, with their faces in video games, their mouth half open while walking on the street dragging their feet and not able of any social interaction, we would have a society of responsible human beings. My generation (I am 27) in this country is pretty scary. Maybe a little pot would do them some good...

Anonymous said...

It's worth noting that Obama didn't come out against legalization per se, merely stated that it "wasn't the solution to our economic difficulties," which I think we can all agree on. He has remained somewhat quiet about legalization generally, and he HAS stopped federal raids that are contrary to state law, which was extremely positive.

Honestly, given the hornets nest this issue represents, I'd rather he keep quiet on it till we get universal healthcare or fail trying.

Charmayne said...

Related: http://www.newswithviews.com/Turtel/joel41.htm

Post a Comment