Monday, March 23, 2009
CONGRESSIONAL RESPONSE TO THE AIG BONUS SITUATION
Just a quick post on this – it doesn’t deserve more.
Our Congress has proven once again that it is a national disgrace. The proposed tax of 90% on AIG bonuses is certainly popular, but will never and should never become law. Here are a few reasons why:
Congress itself approved of the bonuses. Restrictions on executive pay should have been a part of the original TARP legislation and not some retroactive and hastily conceived measure designed to absolve Congress -- rather than to fix the real problem of executive pay for poor performance -- which is all too common in Corporate America.
Congress has highlighted one of its major problems that doesn’t get much publicity – it doesn’t read. Yes, members of Congress read poll numbers – but apparently they don’t read their own legislation. We have learned over the past few days that Senator Chris Dodd apparently forgot he inserted the bonus provision himself. Although Mr. Dodd could have just been telling an outright lie on national television when he denied knowledge of the amendment, the more disturbing possibility is that he really didn’t know. My impression is that members of Congress not only don’t read the legislation they vote on – they may not do the actual writing of it either. In any case, all of Congress is to blame for this, not just Mr. Dodd.
The legislation is likely unconstitutional. The U.S. Constitution prohibits bills of attainder and ex post facto laws. This bill, at the very least, comes uncomfortably close to being both. If passed, the U.S. Government can expect to spend a lot of money defending itself in court for years to come.
The real problem here is the TARP program itself. This was a giveaway of your money to a few large corporations. Anybody who expected Wall Street executives to feel badly about taking some of it for themselves doesn’t understand the mentality of these people. They work on Wall Street because they want to make money – as much money as they can. When there is money for them to take – they take it.
Congress and the previous several administrations can share the real blame for not only the bonus situation, but for the financial mess in general. Yes, Wall Street behaved appallingly – but they played, for the most part, within the rules that were (or in this case weren’t) given to them BY OUR GOVERNMENT. The deregulation and lack of enforcement of existing regulation allowed companies like AIG and Citigroup to become so large that their failures affected the world economy. The lack of enforcement led to massive fraud in the form of mortgage-backed securities, Bernie Madoff, and others. The “hands-off private enterprise” attitude our government (more associated with Republicans, but Democrats are guilty as well) is really to blame more than anything else. For those who still cling to the idea that getting government off the backs of private industry will create wealth for all, consider a sports analogy. Think of private industry as a basketball game. Think of government as not only the refs, but as the league that ultimately decides the rules of the game. If you have too many rules and the refs call everything, the game grinds to a halt. But if you have no rules and no refs, you get Rollerball – not basketball (for those unfamiliar with the movie Rollerball, the two teams at the end play each other in an ultra-violent sport without rules and essentially kill each other until only one man is left standing). Either extreme and there's no more March Madness.
More on reasonable regulation later. Thoughts on Bernie Madoff and Dick Chaney shortly.
I hope to have my weekly video segment up shortly as well.
Our Congress has proven once again that it is a national disgrace. The proposed tax of 90% on AIG bonuses is certainly popular, but will never and should never become law. Here are a few reasons why:
Congress itself approved of the bonuses. Restrictions on executive pay should have been a part of the original TARP legislation and not some retroactive and hastily conceived measure designed to absolve Congress -- rather than to fix the real problem of executive pay for poor performance -- which is all too common in Corporate America.
Congress has highlighted one of its major problems that doesn’t get much publicity – it doesn’t read. Yes, members of Congress read poll numbers – but apparently they don’t read their own legislation. We have learned over the past few days that Senator Chris Dodd apparently forgot he inserted the bonus provision himself. Although Mr. Dodd could have just been telling an outright lie on national television when he denied knowledge of the amendment, the more disturbing possibility is that he really didn’t know. My impression is that members of Congress not only don’t read the legislation they vote on – they may not do the actual writing of it either. In any case, all of Congress is to blame for this, not just Mr. Dodd.
The legislation is likely unconstitutional. The U.S. Constitution prohibits bills of attainder and ex post facto laws. This bill, at the very least, comes uncomfortably close to being both. If passed, the U.S. Government can expect to spend a lot of money defending itself in court for years to come.
The real problem here is the TARP program itself. This was a giveaway of your money to a few large corporations. Anybody who expected Wall Street executives to feel badly about taking some of it for themselves doesn’t understand the mentality of these people. They work on Wall Street because they want to make money – as much money as they can. When there is money for them to take – they take it.
Congress and the previous several administrations can share the real blame for not only the bonus situation, but for the financial mess in general. Yes, Wall Street behaved appallingly – but they played, for the most part, within the rules that were (or in this case weren’t) given to them BY OUR GOVERNMENT. The deregulation and lack of enforcement of existing regulation allowed companies like AIG and Citigroup to become so large that their failures affected the world economy. The lack of enforcement led to massive fraud in the form of mortgage-backed securities, Bernie Madoff, and others. The “hands-off private enterprise” attitude our government (more associated with Republicans, but Democrats are guilty as well) is really to blame more than anything else. For those who still cling to the idea that getting government off the backs of private industry will create wealth for all, consider a sports analogy. Think of private industry as a basketball game. Think of government as not only the refs, but as the league that ultimately decides the rules of the game. If you have too many rules and the refs call everything, the game grinds to a halt. But if you have no rules and no refs, you get Rollerball – not basketball (for those unfamiliar with the movie Rollerball, the two teams at the end play each other in an ultra-violent sport without rules and essentially kill each other until only one man is left standing). Either extreme and there's no more March Madness.
More on reasonable regulation later. Thoughts on Bernie Madoff and Dick Chaney shortly.
I hope to have my weekly video segment up shortly as well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

3 comments:
Thank you very much for your posts and your (much needed) blog idea. I find your points excellent and, as your blog "philosophy" puts it, hard to hear for most people, especially when many citizens (not only in the US actually) are still surfing the Obama wave. He and his administration inherited a mess and it is only normal that mistakes are made, but somehow "he can do NO wrong" and the blame all falls on the "evil, blood-thirsty Wall St. people."
A lot of the mess was made and left by the previous administration, but the unpopularity of Bush's administration is often undermining the ability to look at the new one with a critical eye. This leads to a over "demonization" of bankers, traders, quants and all the alike not residing on "Main St." (what a stupid dichotomy our media created by the way). Blame has to go somewhere, except on our own personal shoulders (God forbids the poor victim, i.e., the American consumer, assumes some of the blame), so if the new administration can do no wrong, it will go to the previous one (in part rightfully so) and the "Wall St." people (again, in part rightfully so).
The fact that people who failed at their job get rewarded anyway is indeed distasteful (although, forget about the amount for a second and just think "principal," you don't hear such a public uproar when PUBLIC officials don't do their job, treat you and your kids like crap and still get their paycheck at the end of the month and enjoy their job stability... I see a hint of hypocrisy.. at least I scream as much "scandal!" every time I go to the post office, for example, as when I hear about these people getting rewarded). I was always, and will always be, a sort of "meritocrat" and I believe in paying people based on performance. As a side note on my meritocratic leaning, I believe that the main problem in this country is education; hence, realize how much effort needs to be made before reaching the meritocracy I would like. The problem is that a lot of those people, like the rude waiter at Chili's or some other eateries of the sort, took their bonus (and tips) for granted. Consumerism has infected also them, of course, so any extra buck becomes part of the pay, has to be spent.
part II:
What bothers me is that it is scandalous ONLY when the "tip" taken for granted is given to the Wall St people and, consequentially, is six figures and more. Yesterday, CNN (whose quality and taste I shall refrain to comment in consideration of language, along, like you very well point out, with the majority of US channels) broadcasted a bus tour of the mansions of all the AIG executives. Sure, these people are living a lifestyle that they should not be capable of afford given their performance for the last two years. But where is my bus tour of all these hard-working, innocent, cul-de-sac sheltered American families? I will always be disgusted by the fact that AIG executive got bonuses, but it hardly compare to the outrage of the TENS of TRILLIONS of dollars that the "good" America has in outstanding debt. Maybe a private jet is more sensational of a flat screen plasma TV in a super-leveraged (cheaply built, by the way) home, but these plasma screen TV's add-up very fast.
So yes, let us find the best way to retrieve ALL the money landed (remember, it is not a gift from the government, we shall get it back with interest, hopefully). But let us be less hypocritical. I want also those who took a second home "equity" loan on their "home" (the meaning of home itself is gone) to pay for their depressed, materialistic (some may say: victim of this society), a little chubby daughter's "dream" wedding to give the money back. I have a little debt; it is my prerogative to pay it back...
Thanks for the thoughtful comments -- I couldn't agree more.
Post a Comment