People have called Bernie Madoff the most hated person in
When a Nobel Peace Prize winner is calling for your head, you know you’re a hated man.
Here’s the brutally honest truth: Bernie Madoff (which should always be pronounced “made-off” as in “made off” with everyone’s money) is the embodiment of what, for too many, has become the American Dream. He may have technically broken some rules (hence the jail time) but his method, in spirit, was well in line with some of our most treasured cultural values -- and not very far from what our country says is perfectly legal.
Bernie Madoff is guilty of creating a Ponzi scheme. Essentially, Mr. Madoff took people’s money, promising to pay them high returns on their investment – but then paid these people with the money of other investors, rather than on gains from actual investments. So long as Mr. Madoff could find investors, the scheme worked. It was only when the economy tanked that Madoff couldn’t find enough new investors and was finally… apprehended (I was going to say “caught” but he really wasn’t – his two sons turned him in).
So Bernie Madoff made money without doing any work – and so long as the economy was good, he didn’t have to work. He made a bundle and everyone was happy getting a guaranteed ten percent plus return on their investments. Wealth without work, wealth without risk. The good life for everyone involved. The American Dream.
Is this much different than the way banks and Wall Street firms operate?
Many people have this image of banks as being large vaults filled with money. Banks, they imagine, lend this money to people and make money on the interest charged for this service.
In truth, banks don’t have anywhere near the amount of money on deposit that they lend out. The capitalization requirements for banks are quite small (thanks to deregulation). The job of banks, therefore, is not really to lend money. A bank’s job is to assess risk. So long as banks are properly assessing risk, in theory they can continue their business without much actual money because most people will be paying off their debts. In other words, debtors replace the money the bank has to pay out with new money. Sound kind of familiar?
Of course, assessing risk properly means you don’t make as much money because it means you can’t lend to a lot of people – namely people who can’t really afford it. So there is an incentive to figure out ways to make risky loans (without taking the risk yourself, of course).
One way to do this is to bundle these loans up and sell them to Wall Street -- who really doesn’t care if they are risky because they can give them a fancy name (mortgage backed securities) get a fancy rating agency to slap a AAA rating on them (another player in the scheme who gets paid to do nothing) and then sell them to the unsuspecting public.
And nothing can go wrong because AIG is insuring all of it.
Everyone is happy. The banks make money, Wall Street makes money, investors make money, and the guy making twenty five thousand a year gets to live in a six hundred thousand dollar home. Wealth without work, wealth without risk. The American Dream.
And this works just fine until the economy tanks and banks can’t find enough people who can actually pay back the debt they’ve issued and the whole house of cards collapses. A few people at the very top get very (unbelievably) rich from this scheme – and the rest of us suffer dearly.
Does this sound familiar?
The only real difference is that the executives in the second scenario probably won’t go to jail. Why? What they did was more confusing than what Mr. Madoff did – involving more people, complex financial instruments, and many different institutions. So there will be a lot of finger pointing and much unraveling to do – and in the end nobody gets blamed.
So what is Bernie Madoff’s real sin here? Perhaps it is that he didn’t make his scheme complicated enough. Or maybe he just got unlucky with the economy. If the economy had only waited fifteen years to fall off a cliff, Bernie Madoff might have been able to spend the rest of his days in
But the real point of this article is that Bernie Madoff isn’t an evil man. He’s just a product of his environment. And I’m not just talking about Wall Street – I’m talking about
I think one reason we all despise Madoff is that we secretly admire the man. As a culture, we have always admired great wealth. But our culture is increasingly putting less and less value on the work and the risk associated with obtaining that wealth. When we see Richard Fuld take 25 million out of Lehman Brothers days before it collapsed or executives at AIG receive bonuses for doing a bad job, we are appalled – but I think secretly jealous.
“This working for a living crap is for losers and suckers,” we secretly think as we slog to work every day making a fraction in a lifetime as Mr. Fuld “stole/earned” in a day on the “job” at Lehman. That’s the way we’d all like to live our lives – getting something for nothing. Wealth without risk, wealth without work. Darn those Wall Street executives!!
But… Come to think of it, many of us do live our lives the same way as Mr. Fuld, the AIG executives, and Mr. Madoff – we’re just not as successful at it.
We routinely spend money we don’t have (and in many cases will never earn) on houses and cars and other luxuries we can’t afford. We are happy to take the ridiculous lines of credit banks routinely offer us on little plastic cards (another Ponzi scheme that’s going to come back to bite us quite soon) because we know we can’t live the way we want if we live within our means.
Indeed, living within one’s means seems very un-American -- especially given the fact that our economy is based on spending and not saving. Be patriotic! Go buy something expensive (with money you don’t have).
Yes -- most of us very willingly participate in the great American Ponzi scheme and then we’re surprised when we find ourselves in foreclosure. We’ll be more surprised when we want to retire – but that’s another article.
So to all the victims of Mr. Madoff, guess what – many of you are just as much to blame as he is. I know I’ll get a lot of hate mail for saying so – but it’s the brutally honest truth.
I won’t blame people who didn’t know they were invested with Madoff or the charities that were hurt. I do feel badly for them. But the rest of you knew.
You knew that investing with Bernie Madoff was a rigged game. You were financially sophisticated, business savvy people who knew that it is impossible to legitimately guarantee ten percent plus returns every year, year after year.
You were among the social elite – a small privileged group who could access Mr. Madoff – a former NASDAQ chairman who had some sort of insider information, you thought, that made his investments risk free.
With a wink and a nod, you all put your money into an investment referred to by many as a “Jewish bond” – a ten percent plus return with no risk. Wink, wink. Nod, nod. You knew deep down this arrangement had to be a fix – but chose to look the other way because you wanted in on the great American Ponzi scheme too. Wealth without risk, wealth without work.
And you got burned (by Bernie – even his first name is ironic) who was doing exactly what you thought he was doing – gaming the system. You just didn’t think you were the part of the system he was gaming.
If we want to fix the economy we have to fix our culture. Rich or poor, we have to accept that nothing is free, bailouts don’t work forever, and there is such a thing as a budget.
The American Dream can’t be based on the lie of easy credit -- or the sentiment of too many at the top that only suckers and losers work for a living and pay taxes.
If we really want the American Dream, we have to be willing to pay for it.
As we are beginning to see, an American Dream based on a Bernie Madoff style Ponzi scheme will render that dream a mere fantasy and our reality a nightmare.

6 comments:
Find a culprit, a scapegoat and you shall be washed from your sins.
Again, I know I sound like a broken record and I apologize for that, it is a matter of PERSONAL responsibility. You are absolutely right in saying that everybody wants a slice of the American dream, but nobody wants to work for it. Our society has increased to staggering levels of instant gratification cravings. Nobody wants to wait/work for anything anymore.
Anybody with a modicum of education knows that a constant 10% and plus return every year is IMPOSSIBLE. If you dod not know that, you probably do not "deserve" to have that kind of money in your pocket anyway. Not because cash is/should be a reward for your intelligence, but because the combination "lack of education/common sense PLUS Money" is a terrible cocktail.
On that note, I am against Obama's stimulus plan which will involve stuffing cash in people's pockets. Many of them will just upgrade their Hummer or buy the new flatscreen TV. The government should just buy stock in ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE firms, infrastructure, education, research, etc and distribute some sort of stock options to the people. These options would have some conditions such as reverse expiration date (you cannot exercise it for the next X years), they cannot be traded for cash, every future profit has to go towards personal outstanding debt (if any), etc... This way new socially and environmentally responsible businesses would get founding, landing will be eased, jobs will be created (immediate impact on consumers), consumers will have an incentive to save and purchase from these companies who produce a "responsible" good, since they will be holding stock options in these businesses...etc... In the meanwhile, instead of funding ridiculous drug and sex education programs (parents job, NOT government), we shall work in making people more financially responsible and develop a new appreciation for money and wealth-building.
So cash in stupid people's pockets, no thanks. I just thought about this rough idea, so the details are very very trivial. Sorry for the side note...
Going back to what we were talking about, I do not want to come across as defending or justifying Mr. Madoff. He shall be prosecuted and he will definitely finish his life in jail (if some Russians oligarchs "contractors" don't get to him before Nature does). But, as you very well point out, let us take a few seconds of reflections and consider the bigger picture; hence, assume our own share of responsibilities.
As mentioned in previous post, pointing finger against others, or this mystical thing people call "the system" (notice that everybody talks about the system or society as if they weren't part of it, it's its own entity... if everybody thinks that, then what constitutes it???), is one of America's favorite hobby. A little introspection would be more than welcome. A Ponzi scheme, as unethical as it may be, can ONLY exist in a medium that allows it to exist. We allowed it to exist, our utopias allowed it to exist, our frustrations allowed it to exist. If people weren't sexually frustrated, so many tens of thousands of men in this country would not buy each year a pill that supposably enhances your "smallness". Sad... More on it (Madoff and "american broken dream", not male enhancement) later...
I think your last paragraph sums it up well -- Ponzi schemes can only exist in societies that allow them to exist.
In terms of the stimulus, I have mixed feelings also. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to me that President Obama has demonstrated -- at least at this point -- the vision necessary to really change the economy. His economic team is a team of Wall Street insiders who are just trying to fix the same system that got us here in the first place.
The brutally honest truth of the matter is that the free market (remember the free market??) is telling us -- actually screaming at us -- that our entire economic philosophy is wrong. These large institutions collapsed because they are, in fact, Ponzi schemes. We are having a housing crisis because the mortgage lenders were engaged in a Ponzi scheme. We will have a consumer credit card crisis because the credit card industry is, in fact, a Ponzi scheme. I could go on and on.
And the problem with "fixing" the problem so that banks can lend again is that the next time they collapse, it will be even worse.
An echo of my same sentiments.
Though what brought it home to me personally was how absolutely justified people felt declaring their desires for Maddoff to suffer the pains of “inmate justice” ie. Violence. For someone who was going through her Corrections class the phenomena was disturbing, yet not unfamiliar. It is yet another reminder of how punitive our society is as a whole. And I kept thinking about how little difference there was between the mentality of the criminal and the victim here, as you so well stated in this post.
Part II:
As you know, our current financial crisis is based on mispricing/overvaluation of what we produced. In simplistic terms, say that we produced, over the last decade, a value of 20, but kept bidding up the value to 100. Until everybody wants to "play the game" it is all fine, everybody is happy, or at least has the illusion of happiness and American dream unfolding in front of them.
The problem starts when somebody wakes up in the morning and says. I do not want to "play dumb" anymore, this is actually worth 20, not 100. That's when the sand castle crumbles. So, those theoretical extra 80 (100 - 20) have no longer a raison d'etre. At least in pre theoretical and economical terms. Indeed, this is the true beauty (to some extent) of money, its flexibility and non-concreteness.
The serious problem is that somebody has to pay for the extra 80. Everybody based their life on the 100 value, not the 20, so now that we realize that everything is actually worth 20, downgrading is hard, very hard. We want to keep the 100 (at least), we want everything to be "like it was," we liked the life at 100: trips, plasma TV's, gas-guzzling cars, Iphones (among all the people you see playing with that stupid toy they don t even need because their job is limited to rank and file in a cubical or spend daddy's money while majoring in "fine arts" at NYU and living 6 of them in an apartment in the Village, how many do you think can afford $1,200/year on a phone plan??? Sorry I could go on for a while about the ridiculousness of tofu-eaters dressed with rags and with faces stuck in their toys to let the word know on Twiter about their sad existences...), where was i... oh yes... how to pay for the extra 80 that we could not afford on the first place.
Well, the most "logical" approach is, apparently, to ask the "rich" to pick up the bill. After all, they are the only beneficiary of "this corrupted and unfair system." We are the victim of the "system." We do not participate in the "system", they created the mess so they should pay!! Wall Streeters are the mean guys, the ones who screwed us all. Every bailout dollar given to them, is a dollar less that the government can put towards our credit card balances, us, the victims.
Why did I put "rich" into quotation marks? Because it is not the actual caricature of the rich that I am talking about; by rich I mean the people who, through work and mostly financial consciousness managed to accumulate (some even a little bit) real wealth, a chunk of the 20... See the arithmetical problem, besides the OBVIOUS ethical one, with that??? Some of this "real" wealth lies outside the 20, of course. This country is filled with families who, generation after generation, lived within their means, saved, educated their children about value of money and financial responsibility, payed off whatever they borrowed, etc... Some of them accumulated part (or all) of their wealth in an illegal way, true, that's the role of justice, not the point here and not included in my sample.
Thus every time you hear a politician say "we need to raise capital gains taxes" (for example), or "let's increase the succession tax" ask yourself why? Because some (careful, I am not saying ALL) of these people refused to play the "consumer" game, did not get an Iphone like everybody else (or if they did, they can afford it and maybe need it for work), did not run their credit cards and carried a balance for a TV or a Hummer??? Thus, grandpa who set up a fund for his grandchildren composed of "secure", steady returns investments like municipal bonds, for example (thus contributing with his "loan" to construction of public infrastructure while alive), so that he feels like he can contribute to send to college his grandchildren has now to pay more than 50% tax when he dies... why? so that, the victims of the "system" can keep playing the game...
Financial responsibility is not rewarded in this country. Suffices to see who has a high "credit score." Now, some may rightfully say (and I agree, but that would be a whole new topic) that good education should not be so costly, that healthcare should be universal and affordable, that some people do run their credit cards for basic needs, because the government does not provide a sort of "safety net" for some people etc... all good points... that my "ranting" does not exclude! I am sorry, but the BIGGER part of the tens of TRILLIONS of dollars in outstanding "consumer" debt are not formed by grandma needing her insulin... They are created by what you, Matt, point out in your post: our mentality.
So, as I said in my first post, we need a Bernie to make us feel better, to make him and the alike (I am a financial mathematics student and proud to be so, I will never succumb to the "over-demonization" of my field) carry all the load of guilt.
I think you have an interesting insight into valuation -- a concept I never really understood (because as you correctly write, it is really just a matter of perception and not a reflection of actual value).
I think the problem goes even further, however. I think we've gotten to the point where we've rationalized creating value out of thin air.
If you look at many of the products Wall Street "produces," they're really just paper with fancy names from fancy firms. So I don't think, in many cases, we've even started with the 20 -- I think we start with zero!
The other problem with investing these days is that even the most responsible people don't know what they have. There is so much fraud out there (in addition to inflated values) that you can't depend on any of the numbers. If Apple says that it has 20 Billion in investments, what does that mean? Is it legit or is it with Madoff?
I absolutely agree with you that financial responsibility is not rewarded in this country. And neither is corporate responsibility (see my AIG article). If you ran a big bank into the ground -- it seems you've had a very good year courtesy of TARP.
As for taxes, I'll have more to say on that topic soon, as April 15th is just around the corner.
Thanks for the comments!!
Whenever you have some time (about an hour each), these are very good lectures on the financial mess:
http://academicearth.org/lectures/origins-of-financial-mess
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIe04svAAo0
The first is from an excellent website www.academicearth.org.
Post a Comment